Exploring the Art & Science of Marketing
Giuliani and McCain beat Clinton?
According to PollingReport.com, if the presidential election were held today, Hillary Clinton would lose to Rudy Giuliani and John McCain.
Rudy Giuliani – 48 percent
Hillary Clinton – 43 percent
———–
John McCain – 46 percent
Hillary Clinton – 44 percent
What does this all mean?
Nothing. The game could change completely when Al Gore decides to endorse a candidate or join the race, and it changes even more when other candidates drop out or join another candidate as a VP candidate.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Russ on March 1, 2007 at 10:20 am, and is filed under Leadership, Politics, Utah Politics. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
No comments yet.
No trackbacks yet.
Political wisdom of the Clinton campaign
about 4 years ago - 2 comments
Looking at the media relations strategy of the Clinton campaign, they never cease to amaze with their skill. Here’s the headline: Clinton chairman: Obama would be good running mate a) I think they really mean it. b) It positions Hillary Clinton as the President, the winner and the “real” nominee for the Democratic party. c)
Milton Friedman on Greed
about 4 years ago - No comments
In the realm of politics, this is quite an interesting video to watch. Milton Friedman was an American Nobel Laureate economist who died in 2006. Friedman was a very bright man.
Do you believe the bible? Republican responses.
about 4 years ago - No comments
I you were in the middle of a presidential debate and someone asked you if you believe every word of the bible, what would you say? Here’s what Rudy, Mitt and Mike had to say, and frankly, I think Mike Huckabee did the best job with this question when put on the spot. It sounds
The truth shows its face on Utah Vouchers
about 4 years ago - 14 comments
$9.3 million was approved by the Utah legislature for use on vouchers until it went to referendum and was voted down. So what’s going to happen to the money? It’s not going to public education because that’s not where the money came from. But again, voucher opponents and many teachers led a lot of people
Utah voucher sign theft caught on video
about 4 years ago - 3 comments
Are you kidding me? What the guy in the video doesn’t realize is that the property owner tied fish line to the sign, which was connected to his house and a ringing bell.
Myth 3: Public education money belongs to public schools
about 4 years ago - 1 comment
This is a continuation of the Myths from the Opposition series. Utah’s Referendum 1: 5 articles you don’t want to miss reading Referendum 1 for Utah? What are the REAL facts? Utah Vouchers: Myths from the opposition Myth No. 2: Vouchers will divert money from schools Myth No. 3: Public Education Money Belongs to Public
Paul Tonks: Draper City’s best choice for city council
about 4 years ago - 2 comments
Even if you don’t live in Draper, Utah to be able to vote for Paul Tonks for city council that’s okay. I still get to voice my opinion and hope that others in Draper will read this and do the same. Why I’m Voting for Paul Tonks for Draper City Council 1 – He’s the
Myth No. 2: Vouchers will divert money from schools
about 4 years ago - No comments
If you’ve been following the “Myths from the Opposition Series,” where I expose the untruths that opponents of the Utah Voucher program are spreading in Utah I’ve got a doozy of a white lie for you today. Get a load of this commonly believed baloney. Myth: Vouchers will divert money from public schools. Fact: This
Utah Vouchers: Myths from the opposition
about 4 years ago - 10 comments
I’m starting a regular series of blog posts from now until the vote on Referendum 1 November 6th, and it is specifically designed to show you the lies that are being spread about Referendum 1 and Utah Vouchers. Myth No. 1 For each child that uses a voucher, the state will lose $3k from it’s
Utah Vouchers: Oreo cookie ad exposed?
about 4 years ago - 10 comments
Can anyone address whether this video is accurate or not? Connor was first. Sure, it’s more accurate than the original oreo ad. But this one (and most of them) leave out one crucial point: who does the money belong to? The person in this video, and those who believe likewise, feel that the taxpayer’s money
